Current:Home > reviewsProposed protective order would infringe on Trump's free speech, his lawyers say -TradeWisdom
Proposed protective order would infringe on Trump's free speech, his lawyers say
View
Date:2025-04-13 09:13:57
Former President Donald Trump's legal team says that a protective order proposed by special counsel Jack Smith would infringe on Trump's right to free speech.
Trump's attorneys made the argument in their response Monday to the special counsel's motion for a protective order over the discovery evidence in the case against Trump for allegedly seeking to overturn the 2020 election.
Trump has pleaded not guilty to charges of undertaking a "criminal scheme" to overturn the results of the 2020 election by enlisting a slate of so-called "fake electors" targeting several states; using the Justice Department to conduct "sham election crime investigations"; and trying to enlist the vice president to "alter the election results" -- all in an effort to subvert democracy and remain in power.
MORE: Special counsel alerts court to Trump’s social media post
The former president has denied all wrongdoing and has dismissed the probe as politically motivated.
Monday's filing argues for narrower limits on the protective order, which Trump's attorneys say would protect sensitive materials while ensuring Trump's right to free speech.
"In a trial about First Amendment rights, the government seeks to restrict First Amendment rights," Trump's attorneys wrote in their filing. "Worse, it does so against its administration's primary political opponent, during an election season in which the administration, prominent party members, and media allies have campaigned on the indictment and proliferated its false allegations."
Smith's indictment against Trump, unsealed last week, disputes that he is being charged for exercising his First Amendment rights, instead alleging that he perpetrated three criminal conspiracies as "unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes and subverting the election results."
Smith asked the judge for the protective order on Friday, referencing a social media post Trump made Friday afternoon in which he said, "IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I'M COMING AFTER YOU!"
In a statement issued after Smith's filing on Friday, the Trump campaign said the post was aimed at political interest groups.
"The Truth post cited is the definition of political speech," a Trump spokesperson said in a statement.
The proposed protective order submitted by Smith does not seek to bar Trump from commenting on the case in its entirety, but would restrict Trump and his attorneys from disclosing evidence such as materials returned from grand jury subpoenas and testimony from witnesses and other exhibits shown to the grand jury. It does not limit Trump from discussing materials that were already available to the public separate from the government's investigation.
Smith's attorneys have said the proposed order is largely modeled after similar protective orders issued in other cases.
But in their filing on Monday, Trump's attorneys accuse Smith's team of asking Judge Tanya Chutkan to "assume the role of censor and impose content-based regulations on President Trump's political speech that would forbid him from publicly discussing or disclosing all non-public documents produced by the government, including both purportedly sensitive materials, and non-sensitive, potentially exculpatory documents."
MORE: Judge in Trump's Jan. 6 case gives attorneys 2 weeks to propose trial date
Trump "does not contest the government's claimed interest in restricting some of the documents it must produce" such as grand jury related materials -- but "the need to protect that information does not require a blanket gag order over all documents produced by the government," the filing says.
Judge Chutkan said in an order on Saturday that she would "determine whether to schedule a hearing to discuss the proposed protective order after reviewing Defendant's response."
veryGood! (58718)
Related
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- More Federal Money to Speed Repair of Historic Mining Harms in Pennsylvania
- Girl, 3, ‘extremely critical’ after being shot in eye in Philadelphia, police say
- Connecticut pulls away from Alabama in Final Four to move one win from repeat title
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- More than 100 dogs rescued, eight arrested in suspected dogfighting operation, authorities say
- Forgot to get solar eclipse glasses? Here's how to DIY a viewer with household items.
- Small town businesses embrace total solar eclipse crowd, come rain or shine on Monday
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- New York City’s skyscrapers are built to withstand most earthquakes
Ranking
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Where's accountability, transparency in women's officiating? Coaches want to know
- More Federal Money to Speed Repair of Historic Mining Harms in Pennsylvania
- Don't be fooled by deepfake videos and photos this election cycle. Here's how to spot AI
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- New York City’s skyscrapers are built to withstand most earthquakes
- Decades after their service, Rosie the Riveters to be honored with Congressional Gold Medal
- Following program cuts, new West Virginia University student union says fight is not over
Recommendation
Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
Don Lemon Marries Tim Malone in Star-Studded NYC Wedding
Iowa vs. UConn highlights: Caitlin Clark, Hawkeyes fight off Huskies
What Final Four games are today? Breaking down the NCAA Tournament semifinals of March Madness
2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
Small town businesses embrace total solar eclipse crowd, come rain or shine on Monday
Kansas lawmakers approve a tax bill but the state still might not see big tax cuts
Iowa-UConn women’s Final Four match was most-watched hoops game in ESPN history; 14.2M avg. viewers