Current:Home > ContactAccused killer of Run-DMC's Jam Master Jay can't have his lyrics used against him, judge rules -TradeWisdom
Accused killer of Run-DMC's Jam Master Jay can't have his lyrics used against him, judge rules
View
Date:2025-04-18 11:46:15
NEW YORK — The man accused of killing Run-DMC's Jam Master Jay can't have his rap lyrics used against him at trial, a Brooklyn judge decided Tuesday in a ruling that doubled as a history-filled paean to hip-hop as "a platform for expression to many who had largely been voiceless."
The ruling came in response to an attempt by federal prosecutors to introduce lyrics penned by Karl Jordan Jr. as evidence of his role in gunning down Jay, a pioneering artist whose birth name was Jason Mizell. His 2002 death remains one of rap's most infamous slayings.
In her 14-page order, Brooklyn Federal Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall traced the evolution of hip-hop over five decades, referencing tracks from over a dozen artists before ultimately finding the lyrics inadmissible.
"From the genre's nascence as an oral tradition, rap artists have played the part of storytellers, providing a lens into their lives and those in their communities," Hall wrote.
Karl Jordan Jr.'s lyrics 'merely contain generic references to violence,' judge says
Prosecutors had sought to introduce several lines written by Jordan that described first-person accounts of violence and drug dealing, including: "We aim for the head, no body shots, and we stick around just to see the body drop."
Those lyrics didn't detail the specific crime, Hall wrote, but "merely contain generic references to violence that can be found in many rap songs."
She pointed to similar lines written by rappers Nas, Ice Cube and Vince Staples, along with interviews with artists like Fat Joe and Future who have publicly discussed the distance between their art and real lives.
Diving further into the genre's past, Hall cited the political activism of artists like A Tribe Called Quest and Queen Latifah, along with the role "gangsta rap" played "as a portal for others to see into America's urban centers."
"The Court cannot help but note that odious themes – including racism, misogyny, and homophobia – can be found in a wide swath of genres other than rap music," she added in a footnote, even referencing lyrics from the Rolling Stones and Jason Aldean, a controversial county music star.
The use of rap lyrics in criminal prosecutions has become a contentious subject in several high-profile cases, including the ongoing racketeering trial of Young Thug. In that case, the judge allowed the lyrics to be presented at trial — a decision that defense attorneys say amounts to racist "character assassination" meant to poison a jury already skeptical of rap music.
Murder trial:What we know about the men accused of killing Run-DMC star Jam Master Jay
'Artists should be free to create without fear,' judge says
In her ruling on Tuesday, Hall wrote that courts should be "wary" about allowing the use of hip-hop lyrics against criminal defendants because "artists should be free to create without fear that their lyrics could be unfairly used against them at a trial."
She said there could be specific exceptions in cases where lyrics discuss the precise details of a particular crime.Jordan and an accomplice, Ronald Washington, are accused of confronting Mizell in his recording studio in 2002, then shooting him in the head. The prosecution argues it was an act of revenge for cutting them out of a drug deal.
The killing had frustrated investigators for decades, but prosecutors said they made key strides in the case over the last five years, conducting new interviews and ballistic tests and getting witnesses to cooperate. Defense lawyers have claimed the government dragged its feet in indicting Washington and Jordan, making it harder for them to defend themselves.
Both men have pleaded not guilty, as has a third defendant who was charged this past May and will be tried separately.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- Repurposing dead spiders, counting cadaver nose hairs win Ig Nobels for comical scientific feats
- What started as flu symptoms leads to Tennessee teen having hands, legs amputated
- Brian Burns' push for massive contract is only getting stronger as Panthers LB dominates
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- Governor appoints central Nebraska lawmaker to fill vacant state treasurer post
- U.S. Olympic Committee gives Salt Lake City go-ahead as bidder for future Winter Games
- Bill Maher's 'Real Time' returns amid writers' strike, drawing WGA, Keith Olbermann criticism
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Americans sharply divided over whether Biden acted wrongly in son’s businesses, AP-NORC poll shows
Ranking
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Are you an accidental Instagram creep? The truth about 'reply guys' on social media
- Two New York daycare employees arrested after alleged 'abusive treatment' of children
- China welcomes Cambodian and Zambian leaders as it forges deeper ties with Global South
- Trump's 'stop
- Maine state police say they shot and killed a man who had bulletproof vest and rifle
- Providence's hurricane barrier is ready for Hurricane Lee. Here's how it will work.
- Majority-Black school districts have far less money to invest in buildings — and students are feeling the impact
Recommendation
The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
Artworks believed stolen during Holocaust seized from museums in 3 states
¿Cuándo es el Día de la Independencia en México? No, no es el 5 de mayo
Are you an accidental Instagram creep? The truth about 'reply guys' on social media
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Are you an accidental Instagram creep? The truth about 'reply guys' on social media
Holly Madison Reveals Why Hugh Hefner Hated Red Lipstick on Playboy Models
Can Atlanta voters stop 'Cop City'? Why a vote could be 'transformative' for democracy